Author Archive

103 – You’re Part of Our Care Team Now Student’s Guide

Tuesday, August 26th, 2014

103

Student’s GuideYou’re Part of Our Care Team Now

Overview: During a routine delivery, the baby is unresponsive requiring resuscitation and a transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit. Prior planning and coordination are essential for successful handoffs in emergent situations.

 

 

Primary Learning Outcomes After completing this lesson, you should be able to:

  • Summarize information that should be included in a pre-delivery team briefing for staff, the patient, and family.
  • Describe strategies and methods to ensure safe, timely, and closed-loop handoffs between units especially during emergent situations.
  • Describe strategies to improve communication between team members, patients and families.

 

 

QSEN Pre-Licensure Competencies The following QSEN competencies are addressed in this lesson:

  • TeamWork and Collaboration:
    • Function effectively within nursing and inter-professional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care.
  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):
    • Integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care.

 

 

QSEN Teamwork & Collaboration Enrichment TeamSTEPPS Best Practice: Check-Backs

  • Team Strategies to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is an evidence-based set of teamwork tools, aimed at optimizing patient outcomes by improving communication and teamwork skills among health care professionals.
    • A check-back is a closed-loop communication strategy used to verify and validate information exchanged. The strategy involves the sender initiating a message, the receiver accepting the message and confirming what was communicated, and the sender verifying that the message was received. Typically, information is called out anticipating a response on any order which must be checked back.

 

Story Directions: As you listen to and read the story, think about the things that the team members did well, and the things you think could lead to errors. Also, consider the questions below as you listen.

 

Reflection Questions:

  1. Describe the information that could have been included in a pre-delivery briefing for the team, patient and family that could have alleviated some stress in this story?
  2. How were check-backs used appropriately in this story to ensure safe, timely, and closed-loop handoffs between units? How could they have been used more effectively?
  3. Which staff member do you believe was the most responsive to the needs of the patients and in this story? Why?

102-The Hard Way Student’s Guide

Tuesday, August 26th, 2014

102

Student’s GuideThe Hard Way

Overview:
This story addresses the issue of hand hygiene, as well as the importance of including patients and family members as valued members of the care team. Hand hygiene is critical to preventing infections. Anyone on the healthcare team should feel comfortable questioning another team member’s hand hygiene practices to ensure patient safety.


Primary Learning Outcomes

After completing this lesson, you should be able to:

  • Describe proper procedures for safe hand hygiene practices during all patient interactions.
  • Recognize and describe the importance of providing patient-centered care and engaging family members as partners in patient care and safety.


QSEN Pre-Licensure Competencies

The following QSEN competencies are addressed in this lesson:

  • Safety:
    • Minimizes risk of harm to patients and providers through both system effectiveness and individual performance.
  • Patient-Centered Care:
    • Recognize the patient or designee as the source of control and full partner in providing compassionate and coordinated care based on respect for patient’s preferences, values, and needs.

Story Directions:

As you listen to and read the story, think about the things that the team members did well, and the things you think could lead to errors. Also, consider the questions below as you listen.

 

Reflection Questions:

  1. What procedures should medical professionals observe in regards to hand hygiene when interacting with a patient?
  2. What do you believe were the three most critical errors made by Dr. Patterson in the story, and how could he have better handled his interaction with Mr. and Mrs. Foster?
  3. The QSEN competencies require you to recognize the patient or designee as the source of control and full partner in providing compassionate and coordinated care based on respect for the patient’s preferences, values, and needs. How did the medical professionals in the story fail at providing this level of care, and what could they have done instead?

101-Lead or Follow, But Don’t Interrupt Student’s Guide

Tuesday, August 26th, 2014

101

Student’s GuideLead or Follow, But Don’t Interrupt

Overview:
This story highlights the importance of communication to build cohesive teams sharing the same mental model regarding each of the patients in their care. The team brief at the start of each day can prevent errors and ensure that patients’ needs are anticipated.


Primary Learning Outcomes

After completing this lesson, you should be able to:

  • Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of team briefs and team communication at the beginning of a shift.


QSEN Pre-Licensure Competencies

The following QSEN competencies are addressed in this lesson:

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):
    • Integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care.
  • Teamwork and Collaboration:
    • Function effectively within nursing and inter-professional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care.

 

QSEN Evidence-Based & Practice Enrichment
Evidence-Based Best Practice: Briefs

Briefs serve the following purposes:

  • They clarify who will be leading the team so that others know to whom to look for guidance
  • They open lines of communication among team members, ensuring that everyone can contribute their unique knowledge base to the task, and thereby set the tone for the upcoming procedure or shift. Protocols, responsibilities, and expected behaviors are discussed and reinforced so that possible misunderstanding are avoided
  • They prepare the team for the flow of the procedure or shift, contingency plans, and the means for resolving any unusual circumstances
  • By delineating expectations, they reduce disruptive or unexpected behaviors.

 

Reflection Questions:

  1. After reading the story and the description of the EBP procedure for team Briefs, evaluate Porscia’s pre-shift brief. Do you think she covered all of the necessary information? Why or why not?
  2. Do you believe Porscia’s reaction to David’s disruption of her brief was handled appropriately? Why or why not? What might you have done differently in her situation?

101-Lead or Follow, But Don’t Interrupt Instructor’s Guide

Friday, August 22nd, 2014

101

Instructor’s GuideLead or Follow, But Don’t Interrupt

Overview:
This story highlights the importance of communication to build cohesive teams sharing the same mental model regarding each of the patients in their care. The team brief at the start of each day can prevent errors and ensure that patients’ needs are anticipated.


Primary Learning Outcomes

After completing this lesson, the student will be able to:

  • Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of team briefs and team communication at the beginning of a shift.


QSEN Pre-Licensure Competencies

The following QSEN competencies are addressed in this lesson:

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):
    • Integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care.
  • Teamwork and Collaboration:
    • Function effectively within nursing and inter-professional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care.

 

QSEN Evidence-Based Practice Enrichment
Evidence-Based Best Practice: Briefs

Briefs serve the following purposes:

  • They clarify who will be leading the team so that others know to whom to look for guidance.
  • They open lines of communication among team members, ensuring that everyone can contribute their unique knowledge base to the task, and thereby set the tone for the upcoming procedure or shift. Protocols, responsibilities, and expected behaviors are discussed and reinforced so that possible misunderstanding are avoided.
  • They prepare the team for the flow of the procedure or shift, contingency plans, and the means for resolving any unusual circumstances.
  • By delineating expectations, they reduce disruptive or unexpected behaviors.

 

Reflection Questions: Students will answer reflection questions upon completing the story. These questions are aligned with the QSEN competencies and are designed to help the student reflect on both the content of the story and the QSEN competencies addressed by the story.

  1. After reading the story and the description of the EBP procedure for team briefs, evaluate Porscia’s pre-shift brief. Do you think she covered all of the necessary information? Why or why not?
  2. Do you believe Porscia’s reaction to David’s disruption of her brief was handled appropriately? Why or why not? What might you have done differently in her situation?
Discussion Questions: Use discussion questions for face to face or online discussion boards to get students to further reflect on the content of the story together.
*Following each question are some potential answers

  1. What can we learn from this story?
    A: It is important to remember the discussion does not have to only reflect what Porscia or David said, but their non-verbal communication can also be discussed.
    A: Listening to David’s concerns, along with the staff members, is an important part of Porscia’s role in keeping all team members involved in patient care.
    A: Every team member is responsible for the care of the patients and not just Porscia. Each team member should be engaged in the patient care process.
  2. What systems could have been in place to better prepare David to enter his new workplace
    A: He could have had an orientation program, to include the daily morning “huddle” with Porscia.
    A: He could have been given an email reminder of “important things to know” before beginning the shift.
    A: He could have been included, by another staff member, when he entered the room.
  3. Did Porscia handle the situation correctly? Why or why not?
    A: She did a nice job of acknowledging David and addressing the current issue, however she may have come across as too assertive.
    A: She may have embarrassed David and subsequently made the situation worse.
  4. What could David have done to better handle the situation?
    A: David could have kept the negative comment to himself and tried to find out what the meeting was about.
    A: He could have asked Porscia what the meeting was about at a later time.

 

Suggested Classroom Mastery Activities: These activities can be tailored for individuals or groups in a face to face or online setting.

  • Imagine that this team did not have a pre-shift brief. What kinds of issue could arise if the team were not on the same page? Create a list of the possible consequences of not holding team briefs. Share your list with a classmate and discuss the possible outcomes. Create a poster reminding your team members of the importance of team briefs and their benefits.
    A: It will foster future communication within the team.
    A: Specific issues can be addressed earlier in the day.
    A: Porscia is able to “check-in” with the team to determine if there are any issues she does not know about.



Instructor Tips: If the students are having trouble with the scenario suggest to the students to imagine they are sitting in on the team meeting, but as a team member and answer the questions. Then have them then re-listen to the scenario and break them into two groups. One group will imagine they are Porscia and try to determine how they would respond and the other half will try to determine how David would respond.

Measuring Student Mastery:

Learning Outcome Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of team briefs at the beginning of a shift. Student struggles to articulate an understanding of the importance of team briefs and team communication at the beginning of a shift. Student can articulate some understanding of the importance of team briefs and team communication at the beginning of a shift. Student can articulate a professional understanding of the importance of team briefs and team communication at the beginning of a shift.

 


Additional Story-Specific Resources: For additional information on improving team communication, please consult the following articles and resources in Further Reading:

 



Story-Specific Best Practices and Proven Tools:

In addition to the ideas generated by students and mentioned in the activities, there are established best practices that may be appropriate to introduce or reference during this lesson to support communication. Some best practices to consider for improving team communication include:

  • Check-Backs
  • Briefs
  • Cross-Monitoring
  • Task Assistance
  • Bedside Handoffs
  • More

 

126-Almost Routine Instructor’s Guide

Wednesday, July 9th, 2014

126

Instructor’s GuideAlmost Routine

Overview:
Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSIs) cause up to 60,000 preventable deaths in the U.S. each year. This story highlights how deviation from evidence-based protocols and checklists can place the patient at risk for CLABSI, and how the CUS technique can help improve team member collaboration and patient safety.


Primary Learning Outcomes

After completing this lesson, the student will be able to:

  • Describe safe, evidence-based practices related to central line insertions
  • Develop a checklist that includes proper protocols for a central line insertion scenario
  • Understand and adopt critical language to ‘stop the line’ when deviation from protocols occurs, regardless of professional hierarchies using the CUS technique.


QSEN Pre-Licensure Competencies

The following QSEN competencies are addressed in this lesson:

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):
    • Integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care.
  • Safety:
    • Minimizes risk of harm to patients and providers through both system effectiveness and individual performance.
  • Teamwork and Collaboration:
    • Function effectively within nursing and inter-professional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care.

 

QSEN Teamwork & Collaboration Enrichment
TeamSTEPPS Best Practice: CUS

Team Strategies to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is an evidence-based set of teamwork tools, aimed at optimizing patient outcomes by improving communication and teamwork skills among health care professionals.

The CUS technique provides a framework for conflict resolution, advocacy, and mutual support. Signal words, such as “danger,” “warning,” and “caution” are common in the medical arena. They catch the reader’s attention. “CUS” and several other signal phrases have a similar effect in verbal communication. When they are spoken, all team members will understand clearly not only the issue, but also the magnitude of the issue.

CUS Technique:

  1. First, state your Concern.
  2. Then state why you are Uncomfortable.
  3. If the conflict is not resolved, state that there is a Safety issue.

 

Reflection Questions: Students will answer reflection questions upon completing the story. These questions are aligned with the QSEN competencies and are designed to help the student reflect on both the content of the story and the QSEN competencies addressed by the story.

  • What safety protocols that can help prevent the risk of CLABSI were violated in this scenario?
  • QSEN requires you to discriminate between valid and invalid reasons for modifying evidence-based clinical practice based on clinical expertise or patient/family preferences. Do you think Dr. Long’s deviations from EBP in this scenario were valid or invalid? Explain your reasoning.
  • Thinking about the TeamSTEPPS best practice “CUS” described earlier, when and how could Carly have employed this technique to better advocate for her patient’s safety?

Discussion Questions: Use discussion questions for face to face or online discussion boards to get students to further reflect on the content of the story together.

  • What can we learn from this story?
  • What other issues regarding patient care and advocacy need to be addressed in this scenario?
  • How could this scenario have been prevented?

 

Suggested Classroom Mastery Activities: These activities can be tailored for individuals or groups in a face to face or online setting. Use one or more to help expand and measure your students’ understanding of the primary learning outcomes for this lesson.

  • Develop a graphic or poster checklist that details the safe practices related to central line insertions
  • Identify what you believe to be the three most critical errors committed by the staff in the story, and describe how they should have been handled
  • How could Carly have used the TeamSTEPPS “CUS” tool to better advocate for Mrs. Sturgis? Write out the dialogue and/or act it out for the class.

 



Measuring Student Mastery: 

Learning Outcome Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Describe safe, evidence-based practices related to central line insertions Student had difficulty describing EBPs related to central line insertion and requires some remediation in the topic Student described some EBPs, but lacked detail or omitted some EBP related to central line insertion Student described evidence-based practices related to central line insertion in detail in writing and/or orally.
Develop a checklist that includes proper protocols for a central line insertion scenario Student’s checklist did not include proper protocols and requires additional instruction. Student’s checklist omitted proper protocols or lacked detail. Student’s checklist included all proper protocols
Understand and adopt critical language to ‘stop the line’ when deviation from protocols occurs, regardless of professional hierarchies using the CUS technique. Student struggled with applying the CUS technique to the scenario and requires remediation on the topic of critical language. Student demonstrated some understanding of critical language and the CUS technique, but lacked detail or omitted some critical details. Student demonstrated understanding of critical language and the CUS technique in writing and/or through re-enactment

 


Additional Story-Specific Resources: For additional information on improving team communication, please consult the following articles and resources in Further Reading:

 



Story-Specific Best Practices and Proven Tools:

In addition to the ideas generated by students and mentioned in the activities, there are established best practices that may be appropriate to introduce or reference during this lesson to support communication. Some best practices to consider for improving team communication include:

  • CUS
  • 3Ws- Who I am, What I am Doing, and Why I Care
  • Advocacy and Assertion
  • More

 

126-Almost Routine Student’s Guide

Wednesday, July 9th, 2014

126

Student’s GuideAlmost Routine

Overview:
Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSIs) cause up to 60,000 preventable deaths in the U.S. each year. This story highlights how deviation from evidence-based protocols and checklists can place the patient at risk for CLABSI, and how the CUS technique can help improve team member collaboration and patient safety.


Primary Learning Outcomes

After completing this lesson, you should be able to:

  • Describe safe, evidence-based practices related to central line insertions
  • Develop a checklist that includes proper protocols for a central line insertion scenario
  • Understand and adopt critical language to ‘stop the line’ when deviation from protocols occurs, regardless of professional hierarchies using the CUS technique.


QSEN Pre-Licensure Competencies

The following QSEN competencies are addressed in this lesson:

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP):
    • Integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care.
  • Safety:
    • Minimizes risk of harm to patients and providers through both system effectiveness and individual performance.
  • Teamwork and Collaboration:
    • Function effectively within nursing and inter-professional teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care.

 

QSEN Teamwork & Collaboration Enrichment
TeamSTEPPS Best Practice: CUS

Using the CUS technique provides another framework for conflict resolution, advocacy, and mutual support. Signal words, such as “danger,” “warning,” and “caution” are common in the medical arena. They catch the reader’s attention. “CUS” and several other signal phrases have a similar effect in verbal communication. When they are spoken, all team members will understand clearly not only the issue, but also the magnitude of the issue.

CUS Technique:

  1. First, state your Concern.
  2. Then state why you are Uncomfortable.
  3. If the conflict is not resolved, state that there is a Safety issue.

 

Story Directions:

As you listen to and read the story, think about the things that the team members did well, and the things you think could lead to errors. Also, consider the questions below as you listen.

 

Reflection Questions: Students will answer reflection questions upon completing the story. These questions are aligned with the QSEN competencies and are designed to help the student reflect on both the content of the story and the QSEN competencies addressed by the story.

  • What safety protocols that can help prevent the risk of CLABSI were violated in this scenario?
  • QSEN requires you to discriminate between valid and invalid reasons for modifying evidence-based clinical practice based on clinical expertise or patient/family preferences. Do you think Dr. Long’s deviations from EBP in this scenario were valid or invalid? Explain your reasoning.
  • Thinking about the TeamSTEPPS best practice “CUS” described earlier, when and how could Carly have employed this technique to better advocate for her patient’s safety?

Does leaving the work environment to learn really work?

Friday, March 15th, 2013

Contributed by Duncan Kennedy

Athletes develop muscle memory on the field, musicians rehearse seated as they would in the orchestra pit, and soldiers train in battlefield conditions. Is being a healthcare professional somehow different in needing the ability to meld ability with application and awareness?

For many healthcare professionals, though, learning new information, skills, and procedures often involves leaving the workplace environment in order to attend classes or access online instruction elsewhere onsite. While both facilitator-led instruction and online learning are proven and accepted forms of training (when designed and delivered properly), training away from the action of the clinical setting is usually at the expense of the learner’s enjoyment, their engagement in the instruction, and their ability to sustain the training and successfully apply it later.

How many of us have been in a learning lab in front of a computer mindlessly clicking through bullet-point text screens trying to reach the end of the course just to earn a mandated “completion” status for the latest organization-wide initiative? How many of us have been pulled away from daily responsibilities only to be placed inside an instructional artifice and forced to multi-task by absorbing the learning, sifting through its relevance, and then visualizing how to apply the parts that are actually applicable to workplace reality? Perhaps worst of all, once we return back to our work environment we find that being away for training often includes a pile of work to catch up on that accumulated while we were gone – effectively doubling the impact that training away from the work environment has on productivity. Plus, most of time you train solo without your leader and team members.

Instead of commoditizing the learning experience in order to maximize throughput or bluntly leverage resources, what if the focus was on customizing the instruction to best suit the learner to maximize impact, application, and sustainment? Using story to engage the human mind – the most powerful simulator ever created – is a proven and universal way to stimulate learner visualization of applying the training at the same time it is being comprehended. This “time compression” of learning and visualization is compounded when it occurs in the environment where it will be applied. Learners are fully engaged and most receptive to important information, new behaviors being demonstrated, and how to take action in a situation. Immersing themselves inside the story and viscerally experiencing it while at the workplace melds the unfamiliarity of the instruction with the daily reality of their work environment. What may not have been done before seems that much easier to accomplish when you’ve already imagined yourself doing it in the place where you work.

Combining the power of story, with the real world setting of the actual workplace, and the ability to visualize and embed new behaviors and practices without distraction or artifice shortens the distance between training, implementation, practice and sustainment.

Why Storytelling is at the Heart of Innovation

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2013

Contributed by Richard Stone

Kevin Kelley describes in What Technology Wants how we possessed the same brain power that we have today at least 100,000 years ago, but it was not until 50,000 years ago that we went from being a primitive species using only rudimentary tools to true innovators. This explosion of innovation occurred almost overnight, concurrent with the arrival of language. Homo sapiens went from using sharp rocks at best, to the development of finely hewn knives, carved figurines, and hearths. Some might say that the use of tools led to the development of our language skills, but it’s more likely that the development of language – and more specifically, storytelling skills – was at the heart of the avalanche of inventions and discoveries that still continues 50,000 years later.

Why was storytelling so pivotal in assisting humans to consistently discover new solutions to life’s challenges? Kelly suggests that storytelling assisted our predecessors because it allowed tribesmen to convey to each other insights and inventions quickly, and to transfer knowledge easily. It proved to be the basis for most every innovation that followed—and each innovation became the foundation for new and more involved discoveries.

What is the significance of this phenomenon for healthcare organizations today? Hospitals that have a vehicle for their tribe (nurses, doctors, techs, pharmacists, etc.) to share what they have learned about creating a safer and more pleasant experience for patients will more likely succeed in the increasingly competitive environment that is certain to see winners and losers in the coming years. While we no longer can gather around the “central fire” in today’s modern work setting, it has become more imperative than ever to create for your team members moments to gather and tell their stories, to share insights as well as cautionary tales about near misses, and to collectively innovate on the job. Learning can no longer be relegated to a structured event a few times a year. It must be ongoing, all encompassing, and inviting. And the best way to do that is still the one that our ancestors first used some 50,000 years ago—storytelling.

If you think your satisfaction and safety scores are decent, think again! Part 2 of my Dad’s Healthcare Journey

Saturday, November 3rd, 2012

Contributed by
Richard Stone

Continuing with my dad’s saga in the healthcare system…

After 9 days in the hospital precipitated by pain and discomfort extending from his chest to his abdomen (which led to a visit to the ED, hospitalization and a score of tests which all came up negative), they discovered during his stay that his atrial fib was not being properly regulated by the drug he was on. The pacemaker they installed just a few weeks previously was doing its job to keep his heart beat around 70, but he was getting abnormal spikes in rate sometimes up to 130 just walking down the hall. Increased dosages of the drug didn’t work, nor did increased frequency. So he sat and waited for the past few days for his clinicians to come up with a solution.

Even though he’s soon turning 97, his mind is still as sharp as a tack, as are his observational skills. Nothing escapes him, and the litany of mistakes and dis-satisfiers he noticed became a daily occurrence. The other night in my daily call to him he gave me his report. I believe they are instructive, but perhaps a bigger question is whether or not his observations and insights will ever make their way back to the hospital’s leadership, much less his care team so they can improve their performance.

Because of his age they are rightly concerned he might fall. He had firm instructions that he wasn’t to leave the bed without assistance, and they had him monitored to alert the staff if he attempted to make an escape from bed without them. Needing to use the bathroom, he called the desk. His tech answered. She said she had just two tasks and she’d be right there in five minutes. Forty five minutes later she still hadn’t shown so he got up and took himself to the bathroom. Apparently the alarm never went off because she showed up a few minutes later wanting to know if he was ready for the bathroom.

Another night, he asked for assistance to help him into the bathroom so he could brush his teeth and use three other tools the dentist recommended—a half hour ritual. So, his tech got him a seat so he didn’t have to stand. When he stood, his socks with the non-skid ridges stuck to the floor. My dad used to be in the janitorial business and he has watched as his room has been cleaned (and on some days not). They now use a device similar to the Swiffers that we can all buy in the grocery store. In the old days, his crews would have first cleaned the floor and then mopped with clean water to clean up the residue. Whatever the residue that is left on the floor by this new cleaning method may, for all I know, leave an antimicrobial barrier. But as far as he is concerned, since his socks were sticking to the floor … it wasn’t clean. This is a reminder that when it comes to patient satisfaction, perception equals reality.

Getting to his age, he’s got lots of meds in addition to those that are supposed to regulate his heart. Some need to be taken a half hour before eating, others an hour after breakfast. Consistently nurses or techs have either brought him all of the capsules at one time—usually the wrong time for many of the drugs. Or, as was the case yesterday, a nurse woke him at 5:30 AM for his drug that’s supposed to be taken a half-hour before breakfast. He asked her why she woke him up so early since breakfast had never arrived earlier than 8:30 during his many stays there. Why couldn’t she just come in at 7:30 and let him sleep? Her response: doctor’s orders. He was dubious. And now exhausted. The truth was more likely nurse’s convenience. He wondered why his care was so unpredictable from day to day?

I asked him if he had ever filled out a satisfaction survey after his many hospitalizations that began this past summer. Yes he had—sounded like it wasn’t HCAHPS given the length of the survey he described. Did he give the hospital poor marks? No, he wanted to be generous.

Then the other day someone from the hospital appeared at his bedside wanting to interview him about his experience there. All he could think is that if he told the truth, word would get back to his care team, and he wondered whether it would change their attitude toward him—for the worse. His response: everything’s been fine.

I went on hospitalcompare.gov to check out this facility’s HCAHPS scores. Consistently they scored below the Florida average, and well below the national average.

I wonder if anyone there is genuinely seeking the truth, and if they do find it, what are they doing to help their teams learn and improve?

Learning From Our Mistakes: A Key Component of Improving

Wednesday, October 10th, 2012

Contributed by Richard Stone

Over the last few months, I have had the opportunity to see our healthcare system up close and personal as my dad, soon to be 97 years old, traversed through it with the first major health crises in his life. It started a couple years ago when he decided to rearrange the boxes in his condo’s storage bin. I came by one weekend and he wanted me to take some things, so I had to lift some extremely heavy boxes off a top shelf. When I inquired how they got up there he informed me he put them there. Interestingly, just a few weeks previously he had been complaining of abdominal pain and had been diagnosed with an inguinal hernia. When I asked at that time how in the world he had gotten a hernia he pleaded ignorance. But as I stood there in his storage area I put it all together and looked at him in disbelief. “I know how you got a hernia, you clod, you lifted these boxes all by yourself.” He was a bit sheepish when confronted with the fact that there are some things he simply shouldn’t be trying at his age.

Well, a few months ago he decided to get the hernia repaired. Something like this is now done in one day as an outpatient procedure, so I came over to support him and his wife. I kiddingly joked with his surgeon when he stopped by the pre-op area to check on him that my dad must be the oldest person he’s ever operated on for a hernia. I was wrong. He had done a repair on a woman who was 106!

Post surgery, I sat with my dad and his wife in a small curtained off area as the discharge nurse went over everything he needed to know to care for the surgical site. He had made it clear before the surgery that he often doesn’t do well with narcotic pain relievers, getting easily constipated, but who looks at charts these days? She gave him a Percocet and a prescription and sent us on our way, encouraging him to eat lots of prunes when he voiced his concern.

Sure enough, a couple days elapsed and he was severely constipated. A call to his surgeon resulted in some encouragement to eat more prunes. Another day or two passed and he was still constipated, and in a lot of discomfort, so now it was time for an emergency room visit. More admonishments to eat fruit, plus a script for a stool softener. Three days later he was back at another ER for a procedure to relieve him of bowel impaction.

I don’t know what the final tally was for all the medical bills for these aftercare visits that all could have easily been avoided—surely in the tens of thousands. All unnecessary. All preventable. But the charge nurse who originally administered the Percocet will never learn from this event. The first ER won’t either, just as the second ER won’t. They are all independent actors on a stage with sets separated by immensely high walls and lots of sound proofing.

Five weeks later my dad took a fall and broke 6 ribs. Even drove himself to the hospital. But that’s another aspect of the ongoing story of waste and mismanagement inherent in healthcare that I’ll share with you in an upcoming blog.